Re: [xsl] Recursive wrapping

[George Cristian Bina <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Something like below perhaps?

<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
  xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";>
  <xsl:template match="node() | @*">
    <xsl:copy>
      <xsl:apply-templates select="node() | @*"/>
    </xsl:copy>
  </xsl:template>
  <xsl:template match="Attribute">
    <OtherAttributes>
      <xsl:copy>
        <xsl:apply-templates select="node() | @*"/>
      </xsl:copy>
      <xsl:apply-templates 
select="following-sibling::*[1][self::Attribute]" mode="att"/>
    </OtherAttributes>
  </xsl:template>
  <xsl:template 
match="Attribute[preceding-sibling::*[1][self::Attribute]]"/>

  <xsl:template match="Attribute" mode="att">
      <xsl:copy>
        <xsl:apply-templates select="node() | @*"/>
      </xsl:copy>
      <xsl:apply-templates 
select="following-sibling::*[1][self::Attribute]" mode="att"/>
  </xsl:template>

  <xsl:template match="node() | @*" mode="att">
    <xsl:copy>
      <xsl:apply-templates select="node() | @*"/>
    </xsl:copy>
  </xsl:template>

</xsl:stylesheet>

Best Regards,
George
---------------------------------------------------------------------
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
http://www.oxygenxml.com


Khorasani, Houman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem, which should be quite straight forward but I can't
> find the solution.
>
>
> XML:
>
> <a>1</a>
> <b>2</b>
> <Attribute>
> 	<Name>xx</Name>
> 	<Value>xx</Value>
> </Attribute>
> <Attribute>
> 	<Name>yy </Name>
> 	<Value>yy</Value>
> </Attribute>
> ...
> <c>3</c>
>
>
>
> Would like to generate:
> <a>1</a>
> <b>2</b>
> <OtherAttributes>
> 	<Attribute>
> 		<Name>xx</Name>
> 		<Value>xx</Value>
> 	</Attribute>
> 	<Attribute>
> 		<Name>yy </Name>
> 		<Value>yy</Value>	
> 	</Attribute>
> 	...
> </OtherAttributes>
> <c>3</c>
>
> There could be 0 to n attribute elements and I would like to wrap them
> between an OtherAttributes.
>
> I have tried to solve it by recursive templates, but somehow I don't get
> there.  Any suggestions?
>
> Many thanks
> Houman