Re: [xsl] A beef with XSLT Sometimes too complicated

[MrDemeanour <mrdemeanour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> > > > > > "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > > In principle, you could use XSLT with a different expression 
> > > language from XPath - this just happens to be non-conformant.
>
> Michael> It's not non-conformant if it it's done using the Michael>
> extensibility features of the language:
>
> Michael> <YPath:value-of select="ypath-expression"/>
>
> Good point. I hope there's no demand for it though :-)

Really??? I find XSLT itself reasonably lucid; it's XPath that I find
obscure and hard-to-remember.

--
Jack.