Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT compiler From: "Mohsen Saboorian" <mohsens@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:35:29 +0330 |
Thanks Andrew, But still I'm confused with two contexts. XSLT compilers: which seems that Saxon is not one (while XSLTX is); If both are same in functionality (being compiler: working like a JSP to Servlet compiler) which one is better in performance.
On 7/17/06, Mohsen Saboorian <mohsens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not sure about generating C++. Please see: > http://xml.apache.org/xalan-j/xsltc_usage.html#api-examples
Ahh I haven't looked in a while :(
In that case as long as you code to JAXP interfaces you can decide at runtime whether to use Xalan-J (with a Translet or a standard 1.0 stylesheet) or Saxon with a 2.0 stylesheet. If both processors are on the classpath you can set the system properties to switch between the two. I guess it comes down to whether you want to use XSLT 2.0 or not.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT compiler, andrew welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT compiler, andrew welch |
Re: [xsl] XSLT compiler, andrew welch | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT compiler, andrew welch |
Month |