Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT2] Some common, generic grouping problems From: "Christian Roth" <roth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:20:32 +0200 |
(Very late reply, I know, so it's merely for the archives.) This is for the following grouping task of my original post: __Example XML #2__ <root> <arbitrary /> <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> </root> The task is to group all elements starting at 'dark-red' up to the last red element before the subsequent 'dark-red' element, i.e.: <root> <arbitrary /> <red> <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> <elem color="red" /> </red> <arbitrary /> <red> <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> <elem color="red" /> </red> <arbitrary /> </root> David Carlisle kindly provided the following solution: <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:output indent="yes"/> <xsl:template match="root"> <root> <xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-starting-with="*[@color=('dark-red')]"> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="@color=('dark-red')"> <xsl:variable name="l" select="current-group()[@color='red'][last()]"/> <red> <xsl:copy-of select="current-group()[. << $l],$l"/> </red> <xsl:copy-of select="current-group()[. >> $l]"/> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:copy-of select="current-group()"/> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:for-each-group> </root> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> I think the given code has a small mistake; the code <xsl:variable name="l" select="current-group()[@color='red'][last()]"/> must read <xsl:variable name="l" select="current-group()[@color='red' or @color='dark-red'][last()]"/> to correctly handle the case where the input document looks like ... <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="red" /> <arbitrary /> <elem color="dark-red" /> ... where the expected output should be ... <red> <elem color="dark-red" /> </red> <red> <elem color="dark-red" /> <elem color="red" /> </red> <arbitrary /> <red> <elem color="dark-red" /> ... i.e. two adjacent "dark-red" p elements must be placed into their own group. I hope I get it right when summarizing the idea behind this code as follows: __ SOLUTION IDEA __ * First, we partition the elements into groups, each starting with "dark- red", our start criterion. * Then, within each group (i.e., list of elements), we look for the last red element and remember it (variable 'l'). * Finally, we create the output in two stages: First, surrounded by the grouping element, we copy all elements of the grouped elements that are positioned earlier than or equal to the last red node (we calculated and remembered earlier) in document order, and then we output the remainder of the elements in that group, i.e. all elements later than the remembered red element. The solution can rather easily be extended to the general (=recursive) case where the grouping should be performed on any nesting level by replacing the <xsl:copy-of select="current-group()..."/> statements with <xsl:for-each select="current-group()..."> <xsl:copy> <xsl:copy-of select="@*" /> <xsl:apply-templates select="." /> </xsl:copy> </xsl:for-each> Regards, Christian.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: RE: [xsl] listing elements & su, cknell | Thread | [xsl] Iteration without nodes, Frank Daly |
[xsl] Re: building a hierarchical c, mnews-xsl@xxxxxx | Date | [xsl] Re: building a hierarchical c, mnews-xsl@xxxxxx |
Month |