|
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:51:14 +0100 |
> That would be true in a naive implementation... ah well I'm a very naive person:-) In other comments in the thread I did try to indicate that an actual implemenattion may do whatever it does, which might not accord with a literal (or one might say naive) reading, of the spec, so long as the observable behaviour is the same. Thanks as always for keeping the thread on track. David
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] xsl:sequence, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, tom tom |
| RE: [xsl] Xpath and Ranges, Ted Henry | Date | Re: [xsl] Use of separator, David Carlisle |
| Month |