Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:06:51 +0200 (CEST) |
David Carlisle wrote: > me> xsl:value-of returns the string value of an element, and that isn't > me> obtainable from xsl:sequence (without doing a lot of work that the > me> system has already done) > > Do you mean that in "to/an/element/string()", > hey that's cheating:-) I'm not sure about the meaning of this word, but after what I saw on the web, it is not very good :-). It seems there is a meaning of "fraud" here. Really, I wondered if there was something I missed because of the "(without doing a lot of work that the system has already done)". But once again, it seems we are agree :-). Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, tom tom |
Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Passing xml nodes to a functi, Bansal, Rabinder |
Month |