RE: [xsl] How expensive is //?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] How expensive is //?

Subject: RE: [xsl] How expensive is //?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:00:59 +0100

> I'm not sure I understand what you said here? Does this mean 
> that contrary to common wisdom and understanding multiple 
> uses of //x will be more efficient than multiple uses of 
> /a/b/c/x  when using Saxon?

Yes. Perhaps. On the other hand, the extra memory needed might slow things
down. The only way to be sure is to measure it.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] How expensive is //?, (continued) Michael Kay - Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:58:48 +0100 Steve - Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:24:10 -0400 Mukul Gandhi - Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:48:14 +0530 bryan rasmussen - Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:18:38 +0200 Michael Kay - Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:00:59 +0100 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] How expensive is //?, bryan rasmussen	Thread	[xsl] looking for best way to group, Bill French
Re: [xsl] XSL:problem printing the , David Carlisle	Date	RE: [xsl] base uri and % encoding, Michael Kay
	Month