Subject: RE: [xsl] short and long empty xml elements From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 18:02:21 +0100 |
> For instance, XHTML is supposed to be > valid XML, but it explicitly states that the following are > not the same: > > <script type="text/javascript" src="somfile.js"></script> > <script type="text/javascript" src="somfile.js" /> > No, it recommends this serialization if you want your XHTML to render properly on older browers that do not have explicit XHTML support. That's quite different. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] short and long empty xml , Abel Braaksma | Thread | [xsl] XSL and XML Help, Cho, Minho |
Re: [xsl] Newbie Question: Creating, Wendell Piez | Date | RE: [xsl] De-Duplification revisite, Nathan Young -X \(na |
Month |