Subject: Re: [xsl] getting type information in xslt 2.0 From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:07:46 -0700 |
What problem makes you believe introspecting type annotations is the solution?
When producing a partial application (function) FXSL needs to discover the actual types of the arguments used so far in order to be able to re-construct the arguments with exactly those types later, when all arguments for the original function have been collected.
Florent Georges has worked on a way to copy the type information of complex (user-defined) types -- but in this case it is just a copy operation, not really getting access to the type information itself:
Unfortunately, we have not been able to extend any of these two solutions to solve the problem addressed by the other solution.
-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] getting type information , Frans Englich | Thread | Re: [xsl] getting type information , David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Deescaping Atom brain dam, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Deescaping Atom brain dam, Frans Englich |
Month |