RE: [xsl] Optimization issue with includes and attribute-sets

["Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> You mentioned attribute sets are rarely used. What would be 
> the preferred alternative?

I wouldn't at all disparage use of attribute sets: I just observe that not
many people seem to find them useful, or simply find that they are a feature
they can manage without.

For most simple uses of attribute sets, they're just a minor syntactic
convenience over calling a named template that creates the required
attributes.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/