Re: [xsl] Getting the root namespace from the input document

["bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>]

hmm, I changed expect to mean what I understand of the standard when
discussing saxon 6 but did not indicate this change in language.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On 2/6/07, bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Okay I have to say that xalan and xsltproc give the results I would
> expect from an XSLT 1.0 processor (not expect as in asserting this is
> what the standard says but just expect as in what I would predict
> would be the result) and saxon 6 gives the result I would expect for
> an XSLT 2.0 processor.
>
> Now I guess the question is, as you indicated before, if the
> expectation meets a standard requirement.
> cheers,
> Bryan Rasmussen
>
> On 2/6/07, Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   Here are the results on Xalan, xsltproc, Saxon 6 and Saxon 8:
> >
> > ~/tests$ xalan -XSL namespace-double.xsl -IN namespace-double.xml
> > <my:same xmlns:my="namespace-double.xsl" added="my:value">
> >   <my:other xmlns:my="other-uri" added="my:value"/>
> > </my:same>
> >
> > ~/tests$ xsltproc namespace-double.xsl namespace-double.xml
> > <my:same xmlns:my="namespace-double.xsl" added="my:value">
> >   <my:other xmlns:my="other-uri" added="my:value"/>
> > </my:same>
> >
> > ~/tests$ saxon namespace-double.xml namespace-double.xsl
> > Warning: at xsl:stylesheet on line 6 of namespace-double.xsl:
> >   Running an XSLT 1.0 stylesheet with an XSLT 2.0 processor
> > <my:same xmlns:my="namespace-double.xsl" added="my:value">
> >   <my:other xmlns:my="other-uri" added="my:value"/>
> > </my:same>
> >
> > ~/tests$ saxon6 namespace-double.xml namespace-double.xsl
> > Error at xsl:copy-of on line 15 of namespace-double.xsl:
> >   Cannot create two namespace nodes with the same name
> > Transformation failed: Run-time errors were reported
> >
> > ~/tests$
> >
> >   Regards,
> >
> > --drkm
> >
> >
> > bryan rasmussen wrote:
> >
> > > Okay I haven't gone and checked but I would expect that some
> > > processors would change the namespace to fit the copy-of namespace.
> > > At
> > > any rate what were the outputs like? Did you have an output from the
> > > processors that was illegal? If not, what did they do?
> > >
> > > This seems like a useful transform to test a lot of processor outputs
> > > on actually.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Bryan Rasmussen
> > >
> > > On 2/6/07, Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Michael Kay wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   Hi
> > > >
> > > > > There's also sometimes a theoretical risk that prefixes
> > > > > will be changed because XSLT 1.0 permits it
> > > >
> > > >   Yes, it is what I thought about.
> > > >
> > > > > but mainstream processors all do the decent thing in
> > > > > straightforward cases.
> > > >
> > > >   And that is why I use it.  But I'm not very comfortable
> > > > with the use of this "observable behaviour" without knowing
> > > > exactly how this happens (prefixes will be changed in
> > > > particular cases or not?).
> > > >
> > > >   In XSLT 2.0, the transformation fails if you try to create
> > > > a namespace node whose the prefix is already bound to
> > > > another namespace URI.  I like that.  In XSLT 1.0, the
> > > > transformation succeed, your result is not correct and the
> > > > error will propagate further in the chain.
> > > >
> > > >   Mmh, before to post, I just wrote a little test.  Input:
> > > >
> > > >     <my:same xmlns:my="namespace-double.xsl">
> > > >       <my:other xmlns:my="other-uri"/>
> > > >     </my:same>
> > > >
> > > > Stylesheet:
> > > >
> > > >     <xsl:stylesheet
> > > >         xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
> > > >         xmlns:exsl="http://exslt.org/common";
> > > >         xmlns:my="namespace-double.xsl"
> > > >         exclude-result-prefixes="exsl"
> > > >         version="1.0">
> > > >
> > > >       <xsl:output indent="yes" omit-xml-declaration="yes"/>
> > > >
> > > >       <xsl:template match="*">
> > > >         <xsl:variable name="dummy-ns">
> > > >           <my:e/>
> > > >         </xsl:variable>
> > > >         <xsl:copy>
> > > >           <xsl:copy-of select="
> > > >              exsl:node-set($dummy-ns)/*/namespace::*"/>
> > > >           <xsl:attribute name="added">my:value</xsl:attribute>
> > > >           <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
> > > >         </xsl:copy>
> > > >       </xsl:template>
> > > >
> > > >       <xsl:template match="@*|node()" priority="-1">
> > > >         <xsl:copy>
> > > >           <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
> > > >         </xsl:copy>
> > > >       </xsl:template>
> > > >
> > > >     </xsl:stylesheet>
> > > >
> > > >   I tested it with Saxon 6, Saxon 8, Xalan and xsltproc.
> > > > Actually, Saxon 6 was the only one to generate an error:
> > > >
> > > >     Error at xsl:copy-of on line 16 of namespace-double.xsl:
> > > >       Cannot create two namespace nodes with the same name
> > > >     Transformation failed: Run-time errors were reported
> > > >
> > > >   I thought in this case an XSLT 1.0 processor will change
> > > > one of the prefixes and not generate an error, but I didn't
> > > > find the right verses in the XSLT 1.0 REC.  Does any one
> > > > know those verses?
> > > >
> > > >   Furthemore, I thought Saxon 8 didn't throw an error
> > > > because it was in compatibility mode, but the transformation
> > > > succeed even with an XSLT 2.0 stylesheet.  It fails if we
> > > > use xsl:namespace to create the node, but not if we use
> > > > xsl:copy-of to copy it.  Again, I didn't find in the XSLT
> > > > 2.0 REC the difference between xsl:namespace and xsl:copy-of
> > > > regarding the duplicate namespace node names.  Any pointer?
> > > >
> > > >   Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --drkm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
___________________________________________________________________________
> > > > Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos
> > > questions !
> > > > Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des
> > > internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses
> > > > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
___________________________________________________________________________
> > Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions
!
> > Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des
internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses
> > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com