Re: [xsl] Universally quantified test of child attribute pr

Subject: Re: [xsl] Universally quantified test of child attribute presence/absence
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:04:41 GMT

> But these expressions are not equivalent, 

yes, sorry, do as I said that is, write a natural language
version, then code it in xpath. My natural language versiosn were not
equivalent, which is why the xpath's were not.

David

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Universally quantified test of child attribute presence/absence, (continued) Abel Braaksma - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:30:38 +0100 Yves Forkl - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:07:49 +0100 David Carlisle - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:17:09 GMT Yves Forkl - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:38:21 +0100 David Carlisle - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:04:41 GMT <= Abel Braaksma - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:21:34 +0100 Yves Forkl - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:08:01 +0100 Abel Braaksma - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:51:30 +0100 David Carlisle - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:19:47 GMT

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Universally quantified test of child attribute presence/absence, (continued)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:19:47 GMT

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Universally quantified te, Yves Forkl	Thread	Re: [xsl] Universally quantified te, Abel Braaksma
Re: [xsl] Universally quantified te, Yves Forkl	Date	Re: [xsl] Universally quantified te, Yves Forkl
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home