Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?
From: "Rashmi Rubdi" <rashmi.sub@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:04:27 -0400

I've always found drag and drop solutions to be more of a burden than
a luxury, and just the sheer fact that the rendered output is usually
not semantically sane is reason in itself to avoid the quick and dirty
purchase.


Me too, I think IDEs that create HTML with drag-and-drop considerably
bloat up the code.

The solution is generated quickly the first time, but maintaining it
can be a big pain.

Karl..

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, (continued) Michael Kay - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:15:07 +0100 Rashmi Rubdi - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:56:48 -0400 Kamal Bhatt - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:19:08 +1000 Karl Stubsjoen - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:01:43 -0700 Rashmi Rubdi - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:04:27 -0400 <= Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\) - Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:28:59 -0700 Owen Rees - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:18:18 +0100 Mukul Gandhi - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:03:04 +0530

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, (continued)
- Owen Rees - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:18:18 +0100
- Mukul Gandhi - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:03:04 +0530

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Karl Stubsjoen	Thread	RE: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Nathan Young -X \(na
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Karl Stubsjoen	Date	Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Robert Koberg
	Month