Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:07:50 +0100

me> for-each is equivalent to for-each 
I doubt anyone would disagree with that, so I'll say instead what I
meant to say

for-each is equivalent to apply--templates

David

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, (continued) Message not available G. Ken Holman - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:12:18 -0400 Steve - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:14:34 -0400 Message not available G. Ken Holman - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:20:09 -0400 David Carlisle - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:05:58 +0100 David Carlisle - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:07:50 +0100 <= Andrew Welch - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:26:37 +0100 David Carlisle - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:11:19 +0100 Andrew Welch - Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:32:12 +0100 Abel Braaksma - Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:35:01 +0200

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, Andrew Welch
Re: [xsl] XSLT Dead?, David Carlisle	Date	[xsl] Finding distinct nodes using , Scott Lynch
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home