RE: [xsl] Relative URI Question

Subject: RE: [xsl] Relative URI Question
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:40:02 +0100
If you declare the XPathContext object as a parameter to your extension
function, the base output URI is available as

context.getController().getBaseOutputURI()

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jason heddings [mailto:rocket@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 06 June 2007 23:17
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [xsl] Relative URI Question
> 
> I've written a (Saxon) Java extension function to compute the 
> relative path between two files.  It's a bit lengthy, but it 
> works well.  The only problem is, I'm not sure how to access 
> the current output document path from within my function.  I 
> was hoping for an XSLT example, or at least some XSL function 
> that provided the current output path.
> 
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [xsl] Relative URI Question
> > From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, June 06, 2007 3:10 pm
> > To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > resolve-uri() turns a relative URI into an absolute URI. There's no 
> > function to do the reverse. In fact, I'm not aware of any 
> algorithm to 
> > do the reverse.
> > 
> > Michael Kay
> > http://www.saxonica.com/
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: jason heddings [mailto:rocket@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 06 June 2007 23:04
> > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [xsl] Relative URI Question
> > > 
> > > Hello-
> > > 
> > > I'm having a bit of trouble with the resolve-uri() function.  
> > > I would like to generate a relative path from one file to 
> another, 
> > > but
> > > resolve-uri() is leaving my full file path.  I'm calling it as:
> > > resolve-uri($path) where $path is the full path to the file, 
> > > including file://.  What I'm hoping for is a path relative to the 
> > > current output document (to make it easier to move the 
> transformed 
> > > docs).
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > --jah

Current Thread