|
Subject: [xsl] Re: [HS] [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:56:36 +0200 (CEST) |
"M. David Peterson" wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:11:58 -0600, M. David Peterson wrote:
Hi David
>> SGML processor is by its very nature *SLOWER* than an
>> XML parser
> s/SGML processor/SGML parser
I feel that should be so. Do you have any numbers? In particular in
the context of this discussion (not about general SGML parsers but HTML
vs. XHTML).
Regards,
--drkm
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSL 2.0 and .NET and VB, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: [HS] [xsl] XSL 2.0 an, Manfred Staudinger |
| Re: [xsl] document() can not used i, Manfred Staudinger | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: [HS] [xsl] XSL 2.0 an, Manfred Staudinger |
| Month |