| Subject: RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local functions From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:34:26 +0900 | 
>Generally speaking, I think functions local to a function (or template) are >not an especially good idea. I used them in Pascal, and the net result was >some very large functions containing lots of functions which in turn >contained their own functions, and the code became very hard to read. It was >very hard to tell what was in scope at any given time. > >Michael Kay Yes I well remember The Wirth User Manual and Report on Pascal and using local functions in that language. My experience was similar to yours and I didn't particularly coding that way. However since some latter day languages still support local functions, I was wondering if somehow they were still in vogue. Cheers Justin Johansson
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Justin Johansson | Thread | Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Colin Paul Adams | 
| [xsl] Vendor extensions for XSLT - , Justin Johansson | Date | RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Justin Johansson | 
| Month |