Subject: Re: [xsl] In Search of People Who Know About and/or Use the Document Function From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:40:26 +0100 |
>>>>> "David" == M David Peterson <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: David> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:37:39 -0600, Colin Paul Adams David> <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not talking about compiling to .NET - this would give very bad >> performance - David> In comparison to? Compiling to native code. David> Being the slowest browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor only David> matters when there are other browser-based XSLT 2.0 David> processors to compare yourself against. And in the mean David> time being the first browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor means David> that, regardless of its native counter part, Gestalt would David> be the fastest browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor, and David> everyone else would be playing catch-up. The other thing is it is currently not possible to compile Gestalt to .NET, as the ePOSIX library which it depends upon does not yet compile to .NET. Which means only gexslt could be compiled. As this means no HTTP access, I don't think anyone would be interested. So only a COM object would work right now. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] In Search of People Who K, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] In Search of People Who K, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] In Search of People Who K, M. David Peterson | Date | Re: [xsl] In Search of People Who K, M. David Peterson |
Month |