|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:14:33 +0000 |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Andrew> On 21/12/2007, Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The cost of the JVM start-up cannot be eliminated, but it can
>> be amortised. For a fair comparison, you need to know what this
>> overhead is, so you can make sensible judgements.
Andrew> I don't think it needs to be amortised... If you start the
Andrew> timing at the correct point and ignore the first few runs
Andrew> then I'd say you can safely forget about JVM startup and
Andrew> warm-up for the remaining runs.
Then you've ignored it completely, so you don't get a fair comparison.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Abel Braaksma |
| Re: [xsl] XSLTPROC performance, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] Santa has come early, Abel Braaksma |
| Month |