Subject: Re: [xsl] saxon:try() From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:09:43 +0000 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Michael> You can do it that way - treating a variable reference Michael> rather like a function call - but it gets difficult if Michael> one reference to a variable is inside a try/catch and Michael> another isn't (or is in a different try/catch). Do you Michael> catch the error twice? I think if the two references are in two different try/catch instructions, then yes, the same error should be caught twice. If one reference is outside of a try/catch instruction, then it will cause termination of the transformation, at that reference point. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] saxon:try(), Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda |
Month |