Subject: Re: [xsl] saxon:try() From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:39:58 +0100 (CET) |
Michael Kay wrote: > There was a proposal developed by Mary Fernandez which I > thought would work quite well. Ah yes, I remember having seen something similar in XQueryP. At the XQuery expression level, something like: try try-expr catch ( ... ) catch-expr-1 catch ( ... ) catch-expr-2 That's another approach. On the one hand, because we are at the expression level, that avoids the discussion on the context (be an error in or out scope of the try). On the other hand, that would make some XSLT constructs untestable within a try. > partly because at that stage of development there was > reluctance to add anything that wasn't explicitly on the > requirements list because timescales were already running > so late, and partly because we didn't want to be > wrong-footed by anything that came out of joint work > later. That seems wise enough (more than ten years should have been really long...) Thanks for those contextual explanations. Regards, --drkm _____________________________________________________________________________ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] saxon:try(), Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Batch transform into one file, Gary E. Daniels |
Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges |
Month |