Subject: Re: [xsl] enclosing siblings in an element From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:05:41 GMT |
> You'll want to remember the key pattern here for future > reference. The OP didn't mention it in this thread but I think in other threads he's reveaaled he's using xslt2, so in fact grouping with keys is rarely needed, xsl:for-each-group is usually easier, something like <xsl:for-each-group group-starting-with="starts-with(@clss,'stem')" David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] enclosing siblings in an , Scott Trenda | Thread | RE: [xsl] The identity transform an, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] Adding Missing Element, Bjorndahl, Brad | Date | RE: [xsl] Adding Missing Element, Plana, Richard |
Month |