|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Request help in understanding: node instance of schema-element(node) From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 14:32:36 -0500 |
Michael Kay wrote:
> You haven't shown the bit that you did wrong, which was almost
certainly to
> run the stylesheet against an unvalidated input document. With Saxon,
you
> request validation by using an option on the command line (-val for
8.9.0.4,
> -val:strict for 9.0.0.n)
Thanks Michael. You are correct, after adding the -val option my
if-then-else statement performed as desired.
So, as I understand it, by adding the -val option SAXON validates the
XML input document against the XML Schema specified by the stylesheet:
<xsl:import-schema schema-location="test.xsd"/>
Correct?
If validation fails, SAXON throws an error and aborts processing.
If validation succeeds, then the stylesheet can be certain that the
<test> element in the input document conforms to the test element
declaration in the XML Schema.
And the stylesheet can check whether validation occurred and succeeded
by using this if-test:
if (//test instance of schema-element(test)) then ...
Correct?
Thus, if the processor does not abort and the if-test fails it means:
-- The input XML document was not validated against the XML Schema.
There is no other reason for the if-test failing.
Correct?
The if-test is not requesting the processor perform run-time validation
of the <test> element against the XML Schema.
Correct?
Do these comments correctly describe the state of affairs:
if (//test instance of schema-element(test)) then
(: the <test> element is what's expected, so operate on it :)
else
{: the <test> element may or may not be what's expected; proceed
with caution :)
Is this the proper way to check <test> before operating on it?
if (//test instance of schema-element(test)) then
//test * 2
else
if (//test castable as xs:integer) then
//test * 2
else
'Error'
/Roger
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Why XTRE1500: Cannot read, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Request help in understan, Michael Kay |
| Re: [xsl] XSL-FO Doctype Problem, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO Doctype Problem, J.Pietschmann |
| Month |