Subject: Re: Jade and hyperdocuments From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 11:24:12 +0700 |
At 14:00 23/04/97 -0400, Vivek Agrawala wrote: >James Clark wrote: >> >> The parser and grove builder are indeed perfectly capable of dealing with >> multiple groves already. However the style language engine assumes in >> several places that it's dealing with a single grove. For example, when >> parsing element construction rules, it normalizes the GIs using the concrete >> syntax of the grove. If there can be multiple groves (with potentially >> different concrete syntaxes), this technique cannot be used. The stuff >> relating to cross-referencing/linking in the backends also assumes a single >> grove. > >Will the normalization of GIs work if all groves use the same >concrete syntax? Yes, but that's not the only problem in the style engine. James
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Jade and hyperdocuments, Vivek Agrawala | Thread | Explicit sequencing in DSSSL, Daniel Speck |
Re: Legal DSSSL? was: Viewports 'Vi, James Clark | Date | Re: Viewports 'Visible' property vs, James Clark |
Month |