Subject: Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolute-Child-Number From: David Megginson <dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:15:50 -0400 |
Paul Prescod writes: > Doh! Sorry. I coulda sworn that was what it did. Is this then what you want: > > (node-list-length (preced (parent node))) This is faster, simpler, and more elegant than my solution. The only adjustment would be this: (+ 1 (node-list-length (preced (parent node)))) All the best, David -- David Megginson ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx University of Ottawa dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.uottawa.ca/~dmeggins DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolut, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolut, W. Eliot Kimber |
Iteration with named let, W. Eliot Kimber | Date | Re: Iteration with named let, Vivek Agrawala |
Month |