|
Subject: Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolute-Child-Number From: David Megginson <dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 17:15:50 -0400 |
Paul Prescod writes:
> Doh! Sorry. I coulda sworn that was what it did. Is this then what you want:
>
> (node-list-length (preced (parent node)))
This is faster, simpler, and more elegant than my solution. The only
adjustment would be this:
(+ 1 (node-list-length (preced (parent node))))
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
University of Ottawa dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.uottawa.ca/~dmeggins
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolut, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: Desperate Questions: [1]Absolut, W. Eliot Kimber |
| Iteration with named let, W. Eliot Kimber | Date | Re: Iteration with named let, Vivek Agrawala |
| Month |