Subject: Re: SGML to HTML with jade? From: Mark Burton <markb@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 10:19:51 +0100 |
jjc@xxxxxxxxxx said: > Jade's implementation of node-lists is lazy: if you don't traverse a > node-list it won't built it. I think it's your definition of subtree > that's causing the slowness. Try using descendants instead of subtree > in: > (build-index (select-elements (subtree (current-node)) > "INDEXTERM"))))))) Substituting descendants for subtree yields a huge difference in speed. Total time down to 20 seconds (from 80). thanks James, Mark -- O(n) Mark Burton <markb@xxxxxxxxxx> O(n) O(n) Order N Ltd. O(n) O(n) Chorlton Lane Farm, Chorlton Lane, Malpas, Cheshire, SY14 7ES, UK. O(n) O(n) http://www.ordern.demon.co.uk/ O(n) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML to HTML with jade?, James Clark | Thread | DD: Call for chapter authors or edi, Tony Graham |
Re: SGML to HTML with jade?, James Clark | Date | DSSSL.KLD - KEDIT Language Definiti, Geir Ove Gronmo |
Month |