Subject: AW: OpenJade behaves differently than Jade From: Roland Schopf <Roland.Schopf@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:23:57 +0100 |
seems to be the same problem described in my previous mail - thats's why the docbook table style sheet fail.
For me this seems to be a bug or it is hopefully configurable?
Regards
Roland
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Schopf Sema Group GmbH
Carl-Zeiss-Ring 6 Phone: +49 89 996524-55
85737 Ismaning Fax: +49 89 996524-44
GERMANY E-Mail:roland.schopf@xxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Christof Drescher [SMTP:drescher@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 10. März 2000 14:35
An: dssslist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: OpenJade behaves differently than Jade
Hi!
As a poor Win95 user, I just came to test OpenJade 1.3. I found a different
behavior towards Jade 1.2, which I think is a little weird:
Before all real numbers were using a dot as a delimiter, e.g. (* 1.2 14pt)
Now, OpenJade issues errors saying "this is not a number", and I must use a
comma, such as (* 1,2 14pt)
But for length-specs, this is not the case; OpenJade issues an error if I
state (* 1,2 13,5pt), and the correct spelling is (weird enough:)
(* 1,2 13.5pt)
Bug or feature? Or configurable?
Christof Drescher
Pro Image GbR, Marburg, Germany
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: OpenJade behaves differently th, Pawson, David | Thread | line-field, Kendall Shaw |
Re: OpenJade behaves differently th, Matthias Clasen | Date | Re: OpenJade behaves differently th, Alexander Sieb |
Month |