Subject: Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI: (was Hypothetical question on namespaces) From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 21:04:37 +0100 |
Trent Shipley writes: > However one of the guys in the local Phoenix Linux users group who works on > the dbXML project slapped me down hard when I wanted to mark up my > Dissertation in XML. > > He said, "SGML is for hand work and narrative documents XML is for > automation and encoding non-narrative data. I don't care what the > books say. I've been in this field for a long time and they are > wrong." I've been in this field for even longer and I say XML is suitable for hand work. Happy? > So I worked for a couple days in XML and then used some SGML > shortcuts, then I decided it was much easier to code without the > stricter XML rules. how did you author? why not let a decent editor do the grunt work? eg emacs > So this raises real issues about whether XML is appropriate for TEI. > > 1) It is used for small projects which is? the TEI? very definitely untrue > 2) The projects tend to be in the Humanities so they have limited funds. I dont but that correlation. There is plenty of money in the humanities > 3) By its very nature coding representations of manuscripts tends who said the TEI was just for manuscripts? > 4) #1 #2 #3 argue against widespread idiot-friendly automation of TEI tools. not for me they dont. I speak as someone who runs a web site for a University computing service which is now largely in TEI XML > 5) TEI document bases tend to be externally documented and > distributed in a> limited and close-knit community. er, can you justify that statement? > 6) Markup for the humanities can benefit from the allow and restrict SGML > features, the so-far unused concurent markup feature, and runs into XML > restrictions. sorry, I cant buy that either > For example, there is no gurantee that elements will nest when > describing real human communication or artifacts. You can work around this > in XML with liberal use of anchors and pointers but it is very hard for > humans to work that way. why is that problem special to the humanities? at first sight, I would suggest that you are being far jesuitical about all this. I personally don't think the XML vs SGML distinction has any real importance. sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
(dsssl) XML not appropriate for TEI, Trent Shipley | Thread | Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Norman Walsh |
Re: (dsssl) Hypothetical question o, Trent Shipley | Date | Re: (dsssl) XML not appropriate for, Norman Walsh |
Month |