Subject: RE: XSL Discussion From: David Megginson <ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 12:05:29 -0500 |
David Schach writes: > > First off, I've mentioned in the past that I think a simple separation of > > the patterns and actions should happen, like: > > <rule> > > <pattern> > > <target-element type="p"> > > </pattern> > > <action> > > <DIV> > > <children/> > > </DIV> > > </action> > > </rule> > > > I agree. This makes it a lot easier to read the rules. The downside > is that it makes XSL even more verbose than it already is. It also gives that advantage that you can more easily hide patterns or actions. PSGML, for example, allows you to hide the contents of an element to unclutter the screen. All the best, David -- David Megginson ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL Discussion, David Schach | Thread | RE: XSL Discussion, L. John Junod |
RE: XSL Discussion, David Schach | Date | Re: Pattern and Action Containers (, Paul Grosso |
Month |