Subject: Re: Interactive XML From: Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:07:08 -0400 (EDT) |
[Martin Bryan] > Others share the concern. The XML/EDI community has made a number of > comments on the current, inadequate, XSL requirements statement, and > has repeatedly pointed out that a generalized mechanism is a > must. Unfortunately it looks like we won't get it for Version 1.0, > and will not get a date for it in this century. However, I live in > hope and eagerly await next month's draft in the hope I will be > proved wrong. The next draft won't prove you wrong; it will be a fairly simple first cut. However, there is discussion going on in the WG about interactivity, but the precise requirements haven't been agreed upon. I feel that there's a consensus that we need to do, at a minimum, as much as you can do with HTML now, and there's a pretty wide feeling that we should do more. But there isn't a ratified document stating so. -Chris, speaking only for myself and not for the WG -- <!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN"> <!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN" "<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487 <USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Interactive XML, Peter Murray-Rust | Thread | Re: Interactive XML, Martin Bryan |
Temporary change in xsl-list-owner, XSL-List Owner | Date | Markup Technologies Conference Call, B. Tommie Usdin |
Month |