Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:20:46 +0100 |
Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > > Daniel GLAZMAN <daniel.glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah... So why does XSL reinvent the wheel and not reuse CSS > > selectors' syntax ? Why those ugly xsl:then and BLA $eq$ "sdfv" ? > > Why position qualifiers using negative integers in order to say 'last > > one' ? Berk !!!! > > Because CSS syntax is not XML. I think that the XSL syntax is reasonable > given the XML constraint. Lets not compare apples and oranges here. If (from the August draft) <xsl:template match="list[attribute(ordered)='yes')]/item[first-of-type()]"> is XML syntax - which it is - then so is <xsl:template match="list[ordered='yes'] > item"> Either way, you need to parse the attributes specially. -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Daniel GLAZMAN | Thread | re: syntax feedback, Guy_Murphy |
Re: syntax feedback, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: syntax feedback, Chris Lilley |
Month |