Subject: Re: An XSL SAX? From: Andy Dent <dent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 15:39:35 +0800 |
Paul Prescod wrote >Andy Dent wrote: >SAX is the XSL equivalent of SAX. The result of applying an XSL stylesheet >is elements, attributes, processing instructions, comments and other such >constructs. SAX is a fine API for discussing those constructs. So what is >the problem? James Tauber has already pointed this out very clearly, and I've published my Aha! acknowledgement. IF XSL had the layout power I need then it would indeed be a viable answer, IF I could also embed an XSL Engine into a Mac/Win C++ program. There are too many if's. Andy Dent BSc MACS AACM, Software Designer, A.D. Software, Western Australia OOFILE - Database, Reports, Graphs, GUI for c++ on Mac, Unix & Windows PP2MFC - PowerPlant->MFC portability http://www.highway1.com.au/adsoftware/crossplatform.html In SF for Macworld Jan 1st-9th 1999, at the AppMaker stand in DevDepot XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: An XSL SAX?, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: An XSL SAX?, Chris Maden |
Re: syntax feedback, Daniel GLAZMAN | Date | Re: An XSL SAX?, Andy Dent |
Month |