Subject: Re: Understanding character handling From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 22:54:12 GMT |
> The need for this is very real. If we can't write entity references in our > result document, we're reduced to using all manner of horrible kludges to make > our viewers see the right thing. Who wants to do... > ... contortions with nbsp deleted. Why is this a problem. is just the character  , so why do you need to write `nbsp'. No machine parsing the result will care which you use. It only `matters' if you plan on reading the result by eye. If you want to write ` ' in your stylesheet rather than remember the unicode number, you can do that now, with the current draft. Just declare the entity in your stylesheet. The only point at issue is that the entity will be expanded by the XML parser that reads the stylesheet and so the character (entity) will appear in the result rather than the named entity, but since these should have the same effect in the result document why does it matter. I seemed to have switched sides in this thread somewhere along the way:-) David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Understanding character handlin, Andrew Bunner | Thread | Re: Understanding character handlin, David Carlisle |
Re: RE: Displaying XML source with , Steve Muench | Date | RE: Understanding character handlin, Lawton, Scott |
Month |