Subject: RE: XSL dependency to SGML apps From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 17:31:24 -0500 |
Hi Chris, <Your comment> It's a note. It's non-normative. It suggests that, if a given (unspecified) application wishes to instantiate the result tree as something other than XML, it might be a good idea to use the result namespace to drive that. For example, if the result namespace is that of HTML 4.0, then using HTML 4.0's recommended serialization (an HTML 4.0 document) would be appropriate. If the result namespace is recognized as using element type names derived from LaTeX's document class, then offering the user an option to serialize as LaTeX might make sense. <Reply> Thanx for the precision that it is a note. But nonetheless it gives clues how to output HTML or XML alternative formats like, you said, LaTex and therefore bring more info about how we could merge DSSSL and XSL style sheet models. We are also exploring why and how to use this provision. Regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL dependency to SGML apps, Chris Maden | Thread | Sorting on numbers, Joop Snijder |
RE: About the style processing inst, Didier PH Martin | Date | Re: Problems with iso-8859-1, Lars Marius Garshol |
Month |