Subject: W3C-transformation language petition From: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 10:31:04 +0200 |
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >Hi Oren. > >A counter example? Hmmm, I hate being asked to back up my spurious >opinions. I far prefer to shoot my mouth off and run, but now you've called >me on it.... > >OK, say we want to address the issue of not just Web pages and printed >documents etc., but realise that Web applications are on the increase, in >particular on the intranet. So, maybe on the basis of that we decide it >would be nice to have... > ><fo:window> > ...content... ></fo:window> > >... > >So, straight back at ya Oren. How might the above be expressed as cleanly >"the CSS way"? You said it: >And given that a way can be found (display: window; maybe, although the CSS >paradigm starts to get strained), shall we inflict such stretches of the >CSS fabric every time we want to extend XSL? And I'd say that it is "straining the paragigm" no more and no less then adding <fo:window> to FOs would be straining the FO paradigm. >As for the large body of your post that suggests broadly that the worth of >FOs will be resolved by the market place... hmmm... I've one thing to say >to you Oren..... *Windows* :P I didn't say I _liked_ the fact that the W3C has delegated the choice to the market. A "windows" typeof solution is all too probable; in fact I feel the most likely outcome would be adoption of CSS using the current syntax, flaws and all, which as I've said I believe to be the worst of all possible worlds. Nevertheless, it seems this is the way the W3C has chosen - by having two standard ways to do almost exactly the same thing, each with its own somewhat different tradeoffs. Imagine there were two incompatible mechanisms for namespaces - say PIs and the current mechanism - and the W3C would make both into standard recommendations. Have fun, Oren Ben-Kiki XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Daniel Glazman | Thread | Fw: Fw: W3C-transformation language, Oren Ben-Kiki |
W3C-transformation language petitio, Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Fw: Fw: W3C-transformation language, Oren Ben-Kiki |
Month |