Subject: Re: Language is not markup and markup is not language. From: "Larry Fitzpatrick" <lef@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 08:46:52 -0400 |
please excuse newbie question... > implimnetation is that the very fact that XSL is XML means that it can be > treated as data, transformed, pointed into, queried, split into sub-trees > etc etc. It's for these reasons that XSL is in the form of XML, and that > the general drive is toward all XML related technologies being described in > XML. Is there some reason that patterns and expressions are not represented in xml wherease much of the rest of the languag is? cheers!lef XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Language is not markup and mark, Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: Language is not markup and mark, Rick Geimer |
Re: xsl:style-sheet: XSL (and entit, John E. Simpson | Date | Re: Language is not markup and mark, Guy_Murphy |
Month |