Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script...

David Carlisle wrote:

> > The biggest problem for me, which I have brought up on this list before, is the lack
> > of support for entity attributes.
>
> OK fair enough it's clear there is currently no support for those.
> But just as clearly if they are needed, one could loby for explicit
> support to be added to XSL without just adding arbitrary procedural
> code in script tags, so it is not really an argument for script is it?

No, it is an argument for complete support of the XML spec. I would prefer this to a
script tag any day.

Rick Geimer
National Semiconductor
rick.geimer@xxxxxxx


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script..., (continued) Rick Geimer - Tue, 11 May 1999 09:18:42 -0700 David Carlisle - Tue, 11 May 1999 18:30:57 +0100 (BST) Rick Geimer - Tue, 11 May 1999 13:55:48 -0700 David Carlisle - Tue, 11 May 1999 22:37:34 +0100 (BST) Rick Geimer - Tue, 11 May 1999 16:43:08 -0700 <= Duane Nickull - Tue, 11 May 1999 11:06:05 -0700 Paul Prescod - Tue, 11 May 1999 14:15:14 -0500 Guy_Murphy - Tue, 11 May 1999 15:38:44 +0100 Don Park - Tue, 11 May 1999 12:21:23 -0700

Current Thread

Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:script..., (continued)
- Rick Geimer - Tue, 11 May 1999 09:18:42 -0700
  - David Carlisle - Tue, 11 May 1999 18:30:57 +0100 (BST)
    - Rick Geimer - Tue, 11 May 1999 13:55:48 -0700
    - David Carlisle - Tue, 11 May 1999 22:37:34 +0100 (BST)
    - Rick Geimer - Tue, 11 May 1999 16:43:08 -0700 <=
  - Duane Nickull - Tue, 11 May 1999 11:06:05 -0700
- Paul Prescod - Tue, 11 May 1999 14:15:14 -0500
- Guy_Murphy - Tue, 11 May 1999 15:38:44 +0100
  - Don Park - Tue, 11 May 1999 12:21:23 -0700

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: On loss of integrity with xsl:s, Duane Nickull
OO and scripting, Paul Prescod	Date	Re: <xsl-script>, Rick Geimer
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home