Subject: Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring()) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 15:30:04 +0100 (BST) |
Paul wrote > but it is an implementor's problem and should not be > reflected in XSL. agreed, I was just musing on possible reasons why deciding on what makes a character is contentious. People do worry that indexing via `xml characters' means either using 32bit characters or (more likely) giving up constant time string accessing. You (or I) may say that it is wrong to base indexing on the arcane details of one encoding (utf16) but still people will worry about it anyway... David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Unicode and XSL (was substring(, James Clark |
limiting value-of...nested lists, Warren Farley | Date | Re: sample file, G. Ken Holman |
Month |