Subject: Re: XSL/CSS Tutorials From: "Michael Sick" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:07:25 -0400 |
Hi Didier, > Conclusion: > If you want mass diffusion of your XML documents, it is preferable to use a > XSLT engine located on the HTTP server (as a servlet because most of them > are Java based) and have this engine transform your XML documents into HTML > to be rendered on as much browsers as possible. Client side transformation > is still experimental except if your target audience is using Internet > Explorer V5 and none are using other browsers like Mozilla, Opera and > others. Thus, the choice is not as much dictated by technical virtues as it > is dictated by common sense and document diffusion strategies. This server side XML + XSL -> HTML scheme has been working quite well at the JavaLobby for 8-9 months now. Its an architecture that we have seen work and that we will continue to evolve. While XSL has been a moving target, its appears to be a worthy one and we intend to use more of it in the near future. mike
begin:vcard n:Sick;Mike tel;pager:917 975 6860 tel;cell:917 975 6860 tel;fax:(212) 896-8222 tel;work:(212) 896-8220 x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:Activated Intelligence adr:;;100 Park Avenue;New York;NY;10017;US version:2.1 email;internet:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx title:Vice President note:Java Lobby - http://www.javalobby.org x-mozilla-cpt:;-20960 fn:Mike Sick end:vcard
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL/CSS Tutorials, Heikki Toivonen | Thread | Re: XSL/CSS = XTL and XFO, Totolaricot |
RE: XSL/CSS Tutorials, Heikki Toivonen | Date | How can i parse a xml-file with xsl, barbara . brosch |
Month |