Subject: Re: Practical Suggestion for XSLT Performance Improvement From: crism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Christopher R. Maden) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 12:56:43 -0700 |
>I don't see how what I was suggesting would at all hurt >incremental rendering. Well, not hurt, necessarily, but not be usable with. Both DSSSL and XSLT were careful to avoid side effects so that processing could start at any point and still have the same results. In an editor, for example, if a user alters a document at one point - let's say they insert a new element - the stylesheet can be re-applied locally to get a close approximation of the result of rendering the entire document. Similarly, in a browser, if a user requests a fragment of a document, there's no reason that the browser has to render everything leading up to the beginning of the fragment, at least not right away. With named pipes, this means that the children will be rendered correctly, but if the parents' rules haven't been processed, then the pipes haven't been created and the children won't write to them. When the parent is processed (possibly after the children), the pipe won't be there for proper processing to occur. It's true that to get precise rendering, you have to start at the root rule and evaluate other templates only when explicitly instructed to do so by an <xsl:apply-templates/> or such. However, even in that environment, a fast processor might jump ahead and prepare child result nodes for use by their parents, and that's prevented by the pipes approach. And I disagree that the pipes approach would permit disposition of the input document immediately; only in very limited cases are there never going to be back-references in the data, and asking a stylesheet author to explicitly account for every possible one is unreasonable. Your view of your model as a sort of assembly model, to which a stylesheet could be compiled, is interesting, but really a stylesheet would need to be analyzed together with a specific input document in order to determine which dependencies were forwards and which were backwards, at which point, the document might just as well be processed at that time. -Chris -- Christopher R. Maden, Solutions Architect Exemplary Technologies One Embarcadero Center, Ste. 2405 San Francisco, CA 94111 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Practical Suggestion for XSLT P, Kay Michael | Thread | Re: Practical Suggestion for XSLT P, Clark C. Evans |
Re: Q: XML+XSL transforms to a prin, Rick Geimer | Date | RE: Question about xpath, John Robert Gardner |
Month |