Subject: RE: Référence: RE: question about transformation From: Marco.Mistroni@xxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:26:59 +0200 |
hi sorry for my mistake( i did not try it...i just only wrote it for suggestion...sorry if it was wrong....) rgds marco > -----Original Message----- > From: EXT David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 23. November 1999 11:28 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Référence: RE: question about transformation > > > > You have stated here exactly the cause of your problem: > > ] Since my transformation stylesheet is an XML document, > > An XSL stylesheet is an XML document, thus this: > > ] <xsl:template match="/"> > ] <?xml blah blah blah > > is an XML error and will generate a parse error from the XML parser > before the XSL system even gets started. <? is the XML syntax for > a text declaration, an XML declaration or a processing instruction. > PI's are not allowed to begin with `xml' and declarations are not > allowed to be inside XML elements, so the above is not a well > formed XML > document. > > The output of XSLT is the tree representing your document. > If that tree is linearised into a file, and XML declaration will be > added by the system if it is needed. Then declaration is not > part of the > tree itself, and so does not need to be in a template (even > if that was > allowed by XML rules) The declaration just tells a parser how > to convert > the linearoised form in the file back to the parse tree that > corresponds > to your output. In particular if you specify an encoding > other than utf8 > or utf16 using xsl:output then an XML declaration will be added by the > system (if it supports the encoding you ask for). > > David > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Référence: RE: question about t, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Référence: RE: question about t, Dale Asberry |
Re: Simple XPath question, Phil Lanch | Date | Re: Référence: RE: question about t, Dale Asberry |
Month |