Subject: Re: what are node set fragments and why are they ruining my life? From: disco <disco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:34:47 -0500 (EST) |
> - I still don't get what is different between a rtf and > a node-set. I mean, I get that a rtf is on the result side > and the node-set is on the input side. The additional difference is that an RTF is, as the name implies, a tree fragment. Whereas a node-set is just an unordered arrangement of nodes, an RTF is an arranged set of nodes, maintaining the concept of tree-structure with parents, children and so forth. > - Phil Lanch also suggested that the reason i got a tree frag was > because i initialized the variable $members with content rather > than a select. But how could I do otherwise, when I want to > set it to the result of a call-template? Just a guess, but make sure you're using <xsl:copy-of> instead of <xsl:value-of>, since copy-of deals with RTF's without flattening them into strings... Dan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: what are node set fragments and, Mark D. Anderson | Thread | Re: what are node set fragments and, David Carlisle |
Re: what are node set fragments and, Mark D. Anderson | Date | RE: what are node set fragments and, Mike Brown |
Month |