Subject: RE: what are node set fragments and why are they ruining my life? From: Mike Brown <mbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:09:49 -0700 |
> - I still don't get what is different between a rtf and > a node-set. I mean, I get that a rtf is on the result side > and the node-set is on the input side. But how could a rtf > not be a set of nodes? You can identify *any combination* of unique nodes from different places in the source tree, using an XPath expression that selects the ones you want. Those nodes are a "node set". They don't have to form a hierarchy or anything. You can create a new hierarchy of nodes (or multiple hierarchies that are siblings of each other), using various XSLT instructions and/or literal result elements. Those nodes are a "result tree fragment". They're branches of a tree. So a result tree fragment *is* a set of nodes. It's just not a "node set" Someone else will have to answer your XT-specific questions. Speaking of XT, when are keys going to be implemented? :) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: what are node set fragments and, Kay Michael | Thread | RE: what are node set fragments and, Kay Michael |
Re: what are node set fragments and, disco | Date | xsl:for-each and variables, Larry Mason |
Month |