Subject: Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:36:12 -0500 |
Steven Livingstone wrote: > > Anyway, from what I understand, most, if not all, products mentioned on this > list have their own extensions and are any 100% fully compliant? > > The XSLT extension mechanism is outlined in the spec and an example of one was provided with James Clark's 11/99 XT implementation ... several of the implementations have a few nits here and there, what we are talking about is substantial compliance (modulo bugs) with full compliance as bugs are reported and fixed. In summary, XSLT extensions, provided through the extension mechanism, do not prevent compliance with http://www.w3.org/tr/xslt . Jonathan Borden XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Steven Livingstone | Thread | Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, Steve Muench |
Are Xalan compiled XSLT's thread-sa, Brian Dupras | Date | Re: possible to mimic while-like be, David Halsted |
Month |