Subject: Re: MS and XSL From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 14:12:16 -0600 (MDT) |
Lee Goddard wrote: > Not that I want to get back to those flamings, have all those > criticising MS's provision of info re. MSIE5 and XSLT read > the W3C pace: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xmlschema-1-20000225/ > > <BLOCKQUOTE> > (in XML (with its own DTD, XSL stylesheet (Nov REC version) and IE5 stylesheet (XSL as supported by version 5 of Microsoft's Internet Explorer)) and HTML, with separate provision of the schema and DTD for schemas described herein. > </BLOCKQUOTE> This just means that the editor(s) of that working draft have chosen to make the draft itself available as HTML, XML+XSLT, and XML+(MSXML 2.0's XSL) ... nothing more. I would not construe it as W3C policy or endorsement of anything. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: MS and XSL, Paulo Gaspar | Thread | RE: MS and XSL, Carlson, Thor |
building a link..., sixty nine | Date | Re: MSXML 3.0 XSLT. Does it work?, Mike Brown |
Month |