|
Subject: Re: XSLT engine performance From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:21:37 +0100 (BST) |
Matt Sergeant writes: > I have no reason to doubt it, but I'd like to see some version numbers > next to everything. yup. I'll expand my little harness to report those. Latest of everything, tho. I did a clean sweep yesterday and got myself in sync. The Sablotron was a patched 0.42 > I'd also like to see some more realistic tests, such > as transforming smaller documents lots of times (like a dynamic XML web > server might do). why do you consider that more `realistic', pray? those of us who consider XML and XSLT mere vehicles for transforming gravestone data are not so interested in a dynamic web server transforming smaller documents lots of times. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: XSLT engine performance, Paul Tchistopolskii | Thread | Re: XSLT engine performance, Rick Geimer |
| Re: MSXML3: Numerical sort needed.., Gene Lake | Date | RE: Html Link to Open xsl, Chris Bayes |
| Month |