Subject: Re: check node From: YueMa <may@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 14:09:01 -0500 |
Thanks for the answer! ;-) You know I still don't feel so comfortable with XSLT grammars, somehow, the false=not(NoteA) works, even I don't have a child element called false..... Yue David Carlisle wrote: > > I use <xsl:if test="false=not(NodeA)">...</xsl:if> > > simpler to write > > I use <xsl:if test="NodeA">...</xsl:if> > > A node set may be used in a boolean context and is true if it is non > empty. You are already using that fact when you use it with not(). > > Your test is actually rather strange, you used false not false() so > you are comparing against the string value of a child element called > false. > > David > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit > http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: check node, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: check node, Nanto, Dan |
RE: parameter in path, Nanto, Dan | Date | Re: parameter in path, Eric van der Vlist |
Month |