Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:39:11 +0700 |
Adam Van Den Hoven wrote: > If I write a document that I can say is 100% XSLT > compliant, then I demand that when I use that document in a processor that > is 100% compliant the resulting output is exactly as I have specified. This is not the case in XSLT 1.0. For example: - Stylesheets that use extensions (whether extension functions or extension elements) are 100% XSLT compliant, but there is not guarantee that a processor will be able to handle them. - XSLT 1.0 also allows extension of output methods and sorting datatypes, which are not guaranteed to be supported. - XSLT 1.0 processors are not required to support disable-output-escaping. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Tobias Reif | Thread | [xsl] XPath expression "everything , Fr\id\iric SCHWEBEL |
Re: [xsl] splitting the date field , Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Re: empty element sabotages x, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |