Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:23:19 GMT |
<xf:func one="xpath" /> <xsl:call-template name="func"> becomes <xsl:with-param name="one" select="xpath" /> </xsl:call-template> The other problem with this syntax is you can't use it if the template name has a prefix already. An alternative would be to open up call-template to allow unknown attributes to be accepted and treated as shorthand params, so <xsl:call-template name="func" one="xpath" > This would cover any cases where the template value wasn't an rtf and where the template name wasn't "name". Howver This is still an element and so still not usable in XPath expressions, so I'd rather have ... something... and then have select="my:func(xpath)" essentially doing something equivalent to <xsl:variable name="x"><xf:func one="xpath" /></xsl:variable> ... select="$x" David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Clark C. Evans | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison |
[xsl] How to check is element has c, Rush, Marc | Date | RE: [xsl] Converting &, >, <, ", an, Clapham, Paul |
Month |