Subject: Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template) From: David.Rosenborg@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:44:45 +0100 |
Hi Uche, > > So it would be plausible for us to specify an exsl:if() function that > > we want them implementers to implement and to write into that > > specification that the second argument must only be evaluated if the > > first argument is true, and the third argument must only be evaluated > > if the first argument is false. > > The only thing to consider about this is that it introduces a side effect. No, it doesn't. However, in languages where you otherwise have side effects (like C) you have to think extra carefully about the evaluation order. Cheers, </David> David Rosenborg Pantor Engineering AB XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Uche Ogbuji |
Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Joe English | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, David . Rosenborg |
Month |